Educational Materials

Do you need information about Parkinson's? PDF's educational materials provide information about symptoms, medications, local resources and more.
*New Resource List*
The PD Resource List includes over 650 resources to address the needs of people living with PD.
New Study Suggests L-Dopa May Slow PD Progression
Just two years after the release of its groundbreaking agenda for Parkinson’s
disease research, the government’s leading medical research agency
has released a report card on where we are today in the quest for the
cause and cure of this debilitating neurologic disorder…and how
we should be allocating resources to the next phase of the struggle.
The report by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), prepared at the
request of Congress, cited six research areas in particular as priorities.
One of these is the field, known as “translational research,”
that links basic and clinical studies — sometimes referred to as
the bridging of the space between “bench and bedside.” The
second is the study of the non-motor aspects of Parkinson’s, such
as the mood disorders and digestive complications that affect so many
people who live with the condition.
One item on the list — the development of so-called “bio-markers”
that would enable doctors to track how fast and far Parkinson’s
has developed in a patient — is already the subject of an invitation
to submit proposals issued by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s
Research. The Board of Directors of the Parkinson’s Disease Foundation
has just voted $250,000 towards this project.
Another promising research opportunity on the list involves further studies
of gene therapy. The report recommends engaging in gene-therapy research
first in animals. Only when the procedure has been shown to be safe would
research be extended to human beings.
A fifth research priority is the identification of new animal models for
Parkinson’s studies. The final one is learning more about how Parkinson’s
affects the systems of the brain that produce dopamine — the chemical
“messenger” that is deficient in people who have Parkinson’s.
January Consortium Paved the Way
Much of the material for the NIH report came from comments and suggestions
made at a consortium of scientists and leading laypersons, convened by
NIH on January 7–8, 2002.
The consortium opened with a report on progress to date from Dr. Diane
Murphy, Director of the Parkinson’s program at the National Institute
of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Included in Dr. Murphy’s
report were financial estimates showing that during the year ending on
September 30 (FY 2002), some $200 million will have been spent on Parkinson’s
research by the NIH as a whole — almost one-third more than NIH
spent two years ago.
Parkinson’s advocates praise the increase, but note that it still
falls short of the budget that was prepared by the NIH scientists who
drew up the original Agenda in the spring of 2000. This budget, known
as a “professional judgment estimate” (PJE), called for additional
expenditures of some $300 million by the end of 2002 —$100 million
more than NIH says will be spent as of that date.
NIH officials in turn respond with the argument that the PJE is just that
— an estimate, not a budget mandate.











